42 大 中 小 游客 172.16.4.x 留言 2009/3/12 21:45
倍可亲(backchina.com) Dude, this is fake news.
How can a principal asylee has not been able to see his wife and son for more than ten years. As far as I know, once asylees get final approval, they can apply for their spouse and children to U.S. via derivative. This process takes anywhere between several months to two years. There is no way in this whole world that they would visit their home country for the "wife and son who he has not seen for more than ten years".
TOP
44 大 中 小 游客 172.16.4.x 留言 2009/3/12 22:11
倍可亲(backchina.com) Yup,
here is another problem of this article:
it says that they all have green card derived from political asylum claim ba<x>sed on fear of persecution of "June 4th Tian An Men Square Massacre". well, that massacre happened in 1989 (almost 20 years ago), so shouldn't they have been all U.S. citizen now?
this is as crappy news as the 10% annual economic growth in mainland China.
TOP
TO #42 (#44)
倍可亲(backchina.com) Obviously, you don't understand the situation at all. The person who has been is the US for ten years does not mean he has green card for ten years. Mostly likely he just got it (or a couple of years max). I personally know a guy has not seen his wife and kids for more that ten years because of green card issue.
Even you have been here for twenty years, does not mean you will/can be a citizen, think about that. I don't even bother to explain to you why.
TOP
52# 大 中 小 游客 72.68.201.x 留言 2009/3/13 07:17
倍可亲(backchina.com) Huh?? ba<x>sed on the executive order of President George Henry Bush in August 1989, INS (now USCIS) "should give proper consideration for all Chinese nationals who ob<x>ject their government and face credible fear of persecution". In 1992, INS announced that it completed processing all I-485 applications ba<x>sed on this order.
Those Chinese nationals were granted permanent residency, not aslyee status, which means that they should be able to apply for U.S. citizenship in 1997.
Chinese asylees granted ba<x>sed on other types of persecution indeed needed to wait a long time because of the 10,000 quota per year. It was only removed in 2004 because of the "Real ID" Act. But that is NOT what this article is talking about.
That's why the blogger above is right about his/her suspicion about the authenticity of this whole story.
TOP
唉。真受迫害的人没人管。倒是很多人在美国以此得利。问问拿六四绿卡的人,你们是真受迫害至今不敢回国吗?还欣然自得。自以为聪明。但是因果报应,到头来总要还的。看着吧。
TOP
55# 大 中 小 倍可亲网友 taison 2009/3/13 12:37 留言
to #52
倍可亲(backchina.com)
引用:
means that they should be able to apply for U.S. citizenship in 1997.
You still don't get it, do you???
Here is the hint, it is not about eligibility, it is about capability.
TOP
58# 大 中 小 游客 71.96.159.x 留言 2009/3/15 05:06
倍可亲(backchina.com) Some people who seek political asylum faked their history. Someone, who came from Shanghai and never knew much about Falungong in China, told the immigration people in US that she needed to seek political asylum because she was a member of the group and she was abused in China. Then she started to read some books about Falungong and tried to pretend she knew something about it, while she was waiting for her green card. Now she has a green card and America likes those people who wants to stay here for political reasons, but for those who has the skill or degree which is good for America, they have to wait and wait longer to get their green card.
TOP